physical affection
April 4, 2008 by moriahjoy
A friend posted some thoughts about physical affection and the need for it and the tension we virgins especially face in light of our desperate desire for both intimacy and just pure physical closeness juxtaposed against our commitment to trying to have healthy boundaries with our friends of the opposite sex in light of having been created sexual beings and our body’s craving for sexual intimacy, i.e. for those of us who have committed to staying virgins before marriage, we want to stay virgins before marriage. ;p
He writes, of this craving, “Shout HYPOCRITE and call me a liar. Isn’t God enough? Of course He is. Sometimes it’s easier to make a rule for ourselves and live under that familiar lash rather than allow ourselves the hope that it might be alright to dream. Of course God is enough… and if He came down and hugged me once every now and then, all would be well.”
In response:
My mother and I have had this conversation many a time; ever since Dad died, it’s come up. God’s supposed to be the father to the fatherless and the husband to the widow, right? Well…you cannot physically hug God or get physical affection from Him, so while I am in no way questioning the theology, I am giving validity to the frustration of those who struggle with this tension, myself foremost. God made us for relationships, God made us for human interaction…God made us for touch. Devoid of anything sexual [saving that for a spouse], we were made to show affection, to love, to care, to express it, but in a world in which there is brokenness, we have found ourselves a little uncomfortable with the platonic expression between male and female and that is a shame.
When my father was dying, all sense of boundaries in those areas were lifted – time was short, life was fleeting, and everyone was hugging and holding everyone else. Because when you enter into an emotional trauma like that…when you face the real pain of life and get a glimpse of issues surrounding eternity, you say “to hell with convention” and your eyes are suddenly open to what is important. And what is important is to hold each other, to cry with each other, to comfort each other, and there are times words fail and all you really need is someone to just hold you.
I remember standing at my father’s grave and I remembering not being able to see through the tears and the rain that fell down…I don’t remember much from that day but I remember my friend X (real nickname ;) who grabbed my hand – and just, gripped it tightly. Knowing his love, through just holding me when I felt so alone even though I was surrounded by hundreds of people who came to say goodbye to Dad, was vastly important. I don’t necessarily remember the words people said during those days and years…I remember more who held me, who cried with me, who put their hand on my shoulder, who squeezed me tightly and just let me know by the weight of their arms around me that they cared, they loved me, and they were there, walking through hell with me.
You’re not a hypocrite, you’re not a liar; you’re exactly as you should be; in my opinion, to not desire that would suggest something is broken. And there is beauty in the struggle; the struggle points toward how things should be, not as how things are, and because of Jesus, we are not without hope.
I responded via blog comment but thought I would post my thoughts here as well, because the way I view life and relationships was forever changed through my experience with my father…and I’m thankful for that. I think I’m a little less uptight (to say the least ;) and a little more willing to error on the side of love than on the side of legalism. (At least I hope that’s what others would say about me. ;p )
His post just opened the floodgate of feelings and thoughts around this whole subject; what is appropriate behavior between male and female. Lots of Christians would tend, out of fear I would suggest, to rule on the side of caution and I would be willing to say many become legalistic as a result, and the minute I see legalism, I run the other way screaming. I think legalism is a copout because it does not demand that we use our minds and the wisdom and logic God has given us, nor does it make us depend upon Him in prayer for guidance in all areas of our life, including relationships. I think, Biblically, it comes down to walking according the Spirit and using wisdom and discernment, and in each case and with each person, it’s going to be different, and so to make any sort of framework or hard and fast rule and commend everyone to follow it (as many seem to do within the Christian culture at large) seems completely out of place with what it means to live in the freedom Christ came and died to give us.
Hi. While I apologize because I don’t have much to add to your post here, but I wanted to let you know, I read your response on RWG’s blog and I just wanted to say that I thought your words were really touching and beautiful.
Thanks, Kara! Welcome. =)
Yup life sucks!
This is a powerful post. Not sure if my comment can do justice to it.
Before I was married it was also the cry of my heart for God to give me a hug. Just a brief one second hug. And you know what? That didn’t go away after I was married. For a while it eased, but I realised that this was just the Evil One trying to pull me away from God. Trying to make me think that my husband was enough for me. I love my husband, but I still long for a hug from God. And I think that this is good. In this broken world we should long for God to give us a cuddle, for this is not our home.
And we should always question our behavious with the people we love on this earth, because it is too easy to stick to the ‘rules’ and use that as an excuse to keep our distance from people. I struggle with showing my affection to those I love, physical and otherwise. I long for closeness and yet I am afraid of it. This is not what God wants for us.
Anyway, I hope you can understand my ramblings. This is a wonderful post.
I think sexual tensions are ingrained in a very biological manner. When we feel good by someone’s hug.. it is quite physical (Biological) in nature.
An embrace exists in many of the animals too..
It is our mind (Partly governed & trained by society and thought) which adds a layer of right or wrong to it..
I am myself, very wary of giving or receiving hugs but that is because of how it is perceived by my or others’ minds..
Hypocrisy is a social term. We know whats right and wrong
Just wanted to say I think you’re great and I appreciate you beloved sister.
Be Blessed
Razzler,
This is a powerful post. Not sure if my comment can do justice to it.
Before I was married it was also the cry of my heart for God to give me a hug. Just a brief one second hug. And you know what? That didn’t go away after I was married. For a while it eased, but I realised that this was just the Evil One trying to pull me away from God. Trying to make me think that my husband was enough for me. I love my husband, but I still long for a hug from God. And I think that this is good. In this broken world we should long for God to give us a cuddle, for this is not our home.
I think that this is one the traps a lot of single women fall into – thinking that marriage or a significant other is going to fill that longing…and then…they start dating or get married…and realize they still have that longing and no matter how much they love their husband…there’s still an unsatiated longing of the heart.
“A God-shaped hole” it’s been called before.
It’s exciting to see another married woman confirm my theory. A lot of married friends have suggested the same, which only makes me more sure that we need to find our validation and affirmation from God, Himself.
I think, when I was in my teens, I unknowingly had this idea and picture of marriage, this idea that a man would complete me…or that life would just simply be “better” and while it is better with a spouse in most cases…no one can ever fill that place except God, Himself. It’s why I loved how RWGs stated it, “There’s always another lover in a Christian marriage.” Our love relationship with God should always trump any other relationship we have…that’s my hope and prayer for my life…I think it’s easy, as you’ve alluded to and as other friends have shared, to let ourselves be distracted by our spouse and forget about our first love (God)…but then…when we are failed, as we will inevitably be, we are reminded of the One who will never fail us, never leaves us, and never forsakes us, who is always perfect in His love. To have that kind of love…is just incredible and can make our love for our spouses that much richer, I think.
Anyway, thanks for sharing, Razzler.
And we should always question our behavious with the people we love on this earth, because it is too easy to stick to the ‘rules’ and use that as an excuse to keep our distance from people. I struggle with showing my affection to those I love, physical and otherwise. I long for closeness and yet I am afraid of it. This is not what God wants for us.
Fabulously said, Razzler! Thank you for sharing and responding. =)
Anyway, I hope you can understand my ramblings. This is a wonderful post.
Thank you. =) But proper thanks goes to RWGs for inspiring this post…it’s an issue I’ve had to wrestle with quite a bit over the years…and he just provided the fuel for the fire. ;p
Just wanted to say I think you’re great and I appreciate you beloved sister.
Be Blessed
Aww, thanks, RWGs! I appreciate you and think you’re great as well.
Enjoy today and know you are blessed!
Thanks for stopping by, rajeevsrajan! And for weighing in on this discussion.
I think sexual tensions are ingrained in a very biological manner. When we feel good by someone’s hug.. it is quite physical (Biological) in nature.
I’d agree with your first statement, but I don’t think I can quite agree with what you seem to be suggesting by your second; when I hug many male friends, all of my female friends and any family members, I feel no ounce of sexual tension in simply hugging them. So while I think sexual tension is tied to the physical, I think it’s so much more…
It is our mind (Partly governed & trained by society and thought) which adds a layer of right or wrong to it..
I’d argue that it’s not simply society and thought that governs our understanding of right and wrong but rather an intrinsic understanding – a conscience, so to speak, that we all have – some of us are more sensitive to it than others, some of us harden ourselves to it and act against it, but intrinsically, we’re all born with a sense of right and wrong, apart from what society may or may not teach us…I believe we then implement societal training regarding right and wrong, but that it exists as an absolute outside of our understanding or grasp of it. Right and wrong are not such because we say they are such; right and wrong are independent of us as human beings.
I am myself, very wary of giving or receiving hugs but that is because of how it is perceived by my or others’ minds..
Hypocrisy is a social term. We know whats right and wrong
I’m not quite sure I understand what you are suggesting here…hypocrisy is a word we use to label something we all know to be true – when one portends to do what is perceived or understood to be “right” but in reality does what is wrong, though he or she deceives others into thinking they are doing right behavior, we understand this to be “hypocrisy.” We could call it something else, but the underlying behavior/distinction would be the same – saying one thing but doing another while not being upfront about one’s duplicity. So, again, I think the concept of “hypocrisy” lies independent outside of our social training.
Anyway, just my two cents in response. Thanks for the thoughtful response. =)
Hi there,
I just found your site and just wanted to let you know that here’s another one to confirm your theory!
(re the need/long for hugs, touch, etc)
Thanks, miriam, for stopping by and commenting! ;p